A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal site in a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment on the Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such spots are subject matter to demanding controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially inside of a delicate coastal atmosphere such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, which is partly designed, is in the proper situation. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion being an try to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation which has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where by views of the sea are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image which includes since come to be emblematic with the intensity with the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the water through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site became Probably the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment in the lawful timeline.
At the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his examination of organizing documents, maps, and problems attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to planning legislation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have described their prolonged-standing connection to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair simply attempting to create a family home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that each one functions are completed based upon Expert assistance and authorised ideas. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes moving into The ocean during a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around construction of wall at coastal web site has grown to be a shorthand description for a scenario that numerous observers see as increasingly popular. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become much more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Beforehand been involved in local advocacy on arranging and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty distinctive professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both of those the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.